Sorry, but I was not happy with the quality of the edits for this one. I had to spend quite a bit of time re-editing, hence my lower score than usual.
Only a couple of mistakes found in the editor's suggestions, but lots of good recommendations. Document has been previousl edited by AuthorHouse UK, so I am realising that a number of the recommendations are revealing themselves to be personal preferences. My aim: Fix up all the obvious grammar mistakes, and If I can see the recommended changes do make things more compact without losing the essence of what';s been said and they read well, I will add them. Beyond that, I will occasionally accept my own preferred way of saying things that I think brings a personal touch of my own and that other editors seem to find okay (i.e., haven't picked up on any issues).
Thanks for a great edit.
Just what I needed! Thank you!
I am completely disappointed with this editor. We found several typos and grammatical errors that were not editing within our document. Clear instructions on formatting style and a link to guidelines for the intended journal were provided, however there were no edits to reflect that these two things were ever reviewed or considered. I am completely surprised at the poor level of quality represented by this editor. I was expecting better results. I will not use this editor again.