Sign In
What to Expect from a Professional Book Editor
The first time you send your manuscript to a professional editor, you're doing something that feels genuinely vulnerable. You've spent months or years on this book. You know its strengths and you're privately aware of its weaknesses. And now you're handing it to a stranger whose job is to tell you, professionally and specifically, where it falls short.
Most of the anxiety first-time authors feel about the editing process comes from not knowing what's going to happen. What will the editor actually do? What will the document look like when it comes back? What are you supposed to do with the feedback? What's the difference between an edit you should accept and one you should push back on?
This article walks you through what to expect from a professional book editor at every stage of the process, from submission to delivery to revision. It's written for first-time authors who want to understand how the process works before they send their first manuscript.
Before You Submit: Setting the Editor Up to Succeed
The editing process begins before the editor opens your file. What you tell your editor before submission shapes how they approach your manuscript. An editor who knows your genre, your target readership, your publication plans, and any specific concerns you have about the manuscript can calibrate their editorial judgment accordingly. An editor who receives a file with no context has to make assumptions about all of these things, and some of those assumptions will be wrong.
Before submitting your manuscript, tell your editor the following.
- Your genre and target readership. A psychological thriller for adult readers has different conventions than a young adult fantasy novel. An editor who knows which set of conventions applies to your book can distinguish between choices that serve your genre and choices that undermine it.
- Your publication path. Are you submitting to traditional publishers, querying agents, or self-publishing? This affects how the editor prioritizes their attention. An author querying agents needs a manuscript that reads as polished as possible from page one. A self-publishing author has slightly more flexibility on timeline but the same need for quality.
- Any intentional style choices. If you use sentence fragments for stylistic effect, write dialogue in dialect, or depart from standard punctuation conventions deliberately, tell your editor. A good editor knows the difference between an error and a choice, but they can only know which they're looking at if you've told them what choices you've made.
- What you're most worried about. Every author has a section they're less confident about, a character whose voice doesn't feel quite right, a plot point they know is shaky. Name it. Your editor will pay particular attention to those areas rather than discovering them on their own halfway through.
- Your timeline. If you have a publication date or a query deadline, say so at the start. An editor who knows you need the manuscript back by a specific date will flag any risk to that timeline rather than discovering a conflict after they've started work.
Choosing Your Editor
If you're using a service that assigns editors automatically, you won't choose your editor. If you're using Editor World, you will, and this choice matters more than most authors realize before they've been through the process once.
The most important variable in the match between author and editor is genre experience. An editor who has spent their career on narrative nonfiction reads your science fiction novel through a different lens than an editor who has worked in speculative fiction for twenty years. The speculative fiction editor knows that your invented terminology is intentional, that your nonlinear timeline is a genre convention, and that the pacing in your action sequences is supposed to move faster than literary fiction pacing. The narrative nonfiction editor may flag all three as problems.
When you browse editor profiles, look at the genres and document types they list. Look at their credentials and career background. Read the verified reviews from authors who have worked with them on similar projects. If the platform allows it, message the editor before submitting. Introduce your manuscript, ask whether they have experience with your genre, and request a sample edit if you're uncertain. A sample edit of your first few pages is the single most useful piece of information you can have before committing to a full-manuscript edit. It shows you the editor's technical skill, their editorial touch, and whether they understand the voice you're working in.
What Happens When the Editor Opens Your File
Different editors work slightly differently, but most professional book editors follow a similar initial process. For copy editing, many editors read the manuscript once quickly before beginning to edit, to understand the whole before correcting any part. This first read helps them identify patterns (a character name that changes spelling partway through, a timeline issue that spans chapters, a stylistic habit the author uses deliberately versus one they use inconsistently) that they can address systematically rather than correcting each instance without the context of the whole.
For developmental editing, the initial read takes longer because the editor is evaluating structure, pacing, character development, and thematic coherence, which require reading the full manuscript before forming any conclusions. A developmental editor who sends you feedback after reading fifty pages has not read enough to evaluate the book. Be wary of any developmental feedback that arrives implausibly quickly.
What the editor does during this initial read varies by the type of editing you've requested. A copy editor may make light notes. A developmental editor is taking extensive notes that will form the basis of the editorial letter. A line editor may do little on the first pass and begin intensive work on the second. In each case the editor is building the contextual understanding of your manuscript that makes the editing itself more precise and more useful.
What Your Edited Manuscript Will Look Like
When your manuscript comes back, it will look different from what you sent. Understanding what you're looking at makes the revision process significantly less stressful.
Track Changes
Professional editors work in Microsoft Word using a feature called Track Changes. Every edit the editor makes is marked in the document: insertions appear in a different color, deletions are shown with strikethrough, and moved text is indicated clearly. Nothing is changed invisibly. You can see every single edit the editor made, in exactly the location where they made it, and you can accept or reject each change individually.
This matters more than it might initially seem. You are not obligated to accept every edit. You should not accept every edit without reading it. Your job when you receive the edited manuscript is to read it carefully, understand each change, accept the changes that improve your work, and reject the changes that don't. An editor who makes a change you disagree with isn't necessarily wrong, but you're the author. Final decisions about your manuscript are yours.
When you accept all the tracked changes at once without reading them, you're essentially asking the editor to make your final decisions for you. That's not what the process is designed to do. Read each change. When you understand why a change was made, you can accept it with confidence. When you're uncertain, look at the comment the editor has left. When you disagree, reject it and move on, or raise it in your follow-up communication.
Comments and editorial notes
Alongside tracked changes, your editor will leave comments in the margin of the document. Comments serve several functions. Some explain why a specific change was made, particularly for changes that might otherwise seem arbitrary. Some flag a potential issue without making a change, leaving the decision to you. Some ask a question: "Did you intend for this character to be present in this scene?" or "The timeline here suggests three weeks have passed, but the previous chapter implies two days. Please check." Some point to a larger pattern: "This is the fourth time in three pages that a sentence begins with 'She realized.' Consider varying the construction."
Comments are not criticism. They're the editor's professional observations delivered in real time while reading your manuscript. A comment that says "This transition feels abrupt" isn't a judgment of your ability. It's an observation that a reader coming to this page cold may experience a jar at this moment, and you might want to address that. You can address it, note it and decide the abruptness is intentional, or disagree that it's abrupt at all. All three are legitimate responses. The comment has done its job simply by drawing your attention to the moment.
The editorial letter (developmental editing)
If you've hired a developmental editor, the most substantial piece of feedback won't be in the inline comments. It will be in a separate document called an editorial letter. An editorial letter is the editor's overall assessment of the manuscript: what's working, what isn't, why the things that aren't working are creating problems, and what you might consider doing about them.
A thorough editorial letter for a full-length novel might run from five to twenty pages. It will typically address structure and pacing, character development, point of view, voice, thematic coherence, and any specific elements of the manuscript that require significant attention. It will also note what's strong, because a good editorial letter identifies what to protect in revision as clearly as it identifies what to change.
Read the editorial letter before you do anything else. Read it through once without taking notes, just to absorb the overall shape of the feedback. Then read it again, slowly, taking notes on what resonates, what you're uncertain about, and what you genuinely disagree with. Set it aside for a day or two before beginning any revision. The feedback that feels most threatening in the first reading often becomes the most useful feedback after you've had time to process it.
The style sheet (copy editing)
A copy editor working on a book-length manuscript will produce a style sheet: a document that records every editorial decision made about the text. Character names and their spellings. Place names. Made-up words and their consistent forms. Hyphenation choices. Number conventions. The style sheet is a reference document for everyone who works on the book after the copy editor, including the proofreader, the formatter, and the author during revision.
If the copy edit reveals inconsistencies in proper nouns or invented terminology that you need to resolve, the style sheet will flag them. If the editor has had to make a choice between two versions of a name that appear in the manuscript (your protagonist is called "Marisol" in chapter one and "Marisela" in chapter fourteen), the style sheet will note the choice they made and you can confirm or correct it.
What a Good Editor Does and Doesn't Do
First-time authors sometimes arrive at the editing process with misunderstandings about the editor's role that create unnecessary friction. Clarifying what a professional editor is and isn't there to do makes the process easier for both sides.
A good editor improves how you said it, not what you said
Your argument, your story, your ideas, and your conclusions belong to you. A copy editor who changes what you're saying rather than how you're saying it is crossing an important line. A line editor who imposes their aesthetic preferences on your prose rather than strengthening yours is doing the same. If you receive an edited manuscript and it reads like a different person wrote it, that's a sign of editing that has overstepped.
Good editing makes your writing more itself. It removes friction, tightens loose sentences, and standardizes what should be consistent. But the voice that remains at the end should be recognizably yours, clearer and more precise than before, but still unmistakably yours.
A good editor preserves intentional choices
Sentence fragments used for rhythm. Unconventional punctuation used for effect. Dialect in dialogue. Repetition used deliberately to create emphasis or unease. These are not errors to be corrected. They're craft decisions to be recognized. A professional editor distinguishes between an error and a choice. When they're uncertain, they ask rather than assuming.
If your editor has corrected something you did deliberately, the right response is to reject the change and, if it's a pattern that will recur throughout the manuscript, send a brief note explaining the choice. Most professional editors respond to this with appreciation rather than defensiveness. They would rather know.
A good editor tells you things you might not want to hear
An editor who only praises your manuscript is not doing their job. A developmental editor in particular is paid to identify the problems that are preventing the manuscript from being as strong as it could be. Some of those problems may be significant. A character who isn't working. A structural choice that's undermining the story's tension. A central argument that isn't as supported as it needs to be.
Hearing this feedback is uncomfortable. It's supposed to be. The purpose of editorial feedback isn't to make you feel good about your manuscript. It's to make your manuscript good. Authors who receive critical feedback and revise in response to it produce stronger books than authors who receive only encouragement. If your editor's feedback only makes you feel comfortable, ask yourself whether they've told you everything they know.
A good editor doesn't rewrite your book
There's a point at which editorial intervention crosses from improving your work to replacing it, and a professional editor stays well on the correct side of that line. If a passage isn't working because the underlying idea is unclear, an editor will flag it. Resolving it is your job. An editor who rewrites passages without being asked, who introduces their own ideas into your narrative, or who substitutes their stylistic preferences for yours throughout the manuscript is doing something that isn't editing.
How to Work With Your Editor's Feedback
Receiving editorial feedback well is a skill, and it's one that improves with practice. First-time authors often go through several predictable stages when they open their edited manuscript: defensiveness, anxiety, relief, and finally productive engagement. The process is faster and less stressful if you know what to expect.
Give yourself time before you respond
Don't open your edited manuscript and start accepting or rejecting changes in the first hour. Read through the editorial letter, if there is one. Scroll through the tracked changes to get an overall sense of the density and nature of the edits. Then close the document and give yourself a day, ideally two, before you begin working through it systematically. The feedback that feels most threatening in the first reading looks different after you've slept on it.
Separate the edits into categories
As you work through the tracked changes, you'll notice that they fall into roughly three categories. Changes you agree with immediately: accept these and move on. Changes you're uncertain about: leave them marked and return to them after you've been through the whole document. Changes you disagree with: reject them, but note what they are in case a pattern emerges. If you're rejecting the same type of change repeatedly, it may be worth asking yourself whether the editor is seeing something consistent that you're not.
Ask questions before making major revisions
If the developmental feedback includes a recommendation that would require significant restructuring, don't begin that restructuring until you've fully understood the recommendation. It's entirely appropriate to send your editor a follow-up message: "You suggested moving the timeline of chapter eight to earlier in the manuscript. Can you say more about what's creating the problem you're identifying?" A good editor will clarify. Understanding why a change is being suggested helps you decide whether the suggested change is the right solution or whether there's a different approach that addresses the same problem.
You don't have to do everything the editor suggests
Editorial feedback is professional advice, not instruction. You're the author. A developmental editor who recommends cutting a subplot is offering their professional judgment that the subplot is weakening the manuscript. That judgment may be correct. It may also be missing something about the subplot's function that isn't immediately visible to a first reader. You can implement the recommendation, find a different solution to the same problem, or conclude after careful consideration that the subplot should stay. All three are legitimate outcomes of engaging with the feedback honestly.
The key word is honestly. The authors who get the least from editorial feedback are the ones who dismiss it defensively without genuinely considering whether it might be right. The authors who get the most are the ones who take each piece of feedback seriously, evaluate it against the manuscript's needs, and make a considered decision.
After Revision: What Comes Next
After you've worked through the tracked changes and incorporated any developmental feedback through revision, your manuscript is in better shape than when you started. What comes next depends on which editorial stage you've just completed.
After developmental editing, the manuscript typically goes through a significant author revision followed by copy editing. The author revision period after developmental feedback can take anywhere from two weeks to several months depending on the scope of changes required. After copy editing, the manuscript goes to formatting, then proofreading on the formatted version. After proofreading, the manuscript is ready for production and publication.
Some editing agreements include a follow-up round: you return the revised manuscript to the editor for a second pass, either to confirm you've addressed the flagged issues or to catch anything new that's been introduced in revision. If a follow-up round is included in your agreement, use it. Fresh editorial eyes on a revised manuscript consistently catch things that neither the author nor the editor caught in the first pass.
The Working Relationship: What Makes It Work
The best editorial relationships are professional, honest, and collaborative. They're professional in that both parties take the work seriously and meet their commitments. They're honest in that the editor says what they genuinely observe about the manuscript and the author engages with the feedback rather than deflecting it. They're collaborative in that the goal is shared: making the manuscript the strongest it can be.
Authors who treat their editor as an adversary, who approach feedback defensively, or who submit manuscripts without providing context get worse results than authors who treat the relationship as a partnership. The editor has skills you don't have: distance from the manuscript, trained editorial attention, and experience reading the type of work you've written. You have something the editor doesn't have: full knowledge of the story's intentions, the research behind the choices, and the vision that generated the manuscript in the first place. A good editorial relationship combines both.
When the relationship works well, most authors report that the edited manuscript is visibly stronger than the one they submitted, that the feedback helped them understand their own work more clearly, and that the process, though uncomfortable at moments, was worth it. That experience is what professional book editing is supposed to deliver.
Getting Started with Your First Edit
Editor World connects book authors with professional native English editors who have experience in their specific genre and the type of editing they need. You browse editor profiles by specialization, credentials, and verified client ratings. You contact any editor directly before submitting to discuss your manuscript and request a free sample edit before committing. Every editor is a native English speaker from the US, UK, or Canada. No AI tools are used at any stage.
Visit the book editing services page for full details on what's included at each editorial stage. Use the instant price calculator to see your exact cost for your word count and turnaround time before committing. Or browse available editors now to find the right fit for your manuscript and your timeline.
Content reviewed by Editor World editorial staff. Editor World provides professional English editing and proofreading services for academic researchers, graduate students, and business professionals worldwide.