How to Publish a Journal Article in the Social Sciences: Five Key Steps
If you're working toward publishing research in education, psychology, sociology, political science, or another social science discipline, this guide is for you. Whether you've just completed your research and are starting to write, or you have a finished draft you're preparing for submission, these five steps will help you understand how to publish a journal article that's ready for peer review.
Quick answer: the five steps
To publish a social science journal article: first, get your full argument on the page before you polish it. Second, follow the standard research-article structure (introduction, literature review, methodology, results, discussion). Third, make your tense, point of view, and formatting consistent. Fourth, choose the right journal by matching your topic to its aims and scope, and screen out predatory journals. Fifth, polish the manuscript thoroughly, ideally with a professional academic editor, before you submit. Budget six months to a year from submission to publication, and prepare for the peer review process.
Step 1: Get Your Ideas on the Page First
In the early stages of writing, your primary goal is to generate content, not to perfect it. Write more than you think you need. It's far easier for an editor to help you cut and tighten language than to work with a draft that leaves important details unexplained. Don't let the pursuit of the right phrasing stop you from getting your argument down in full. You can refine it later.
Step 2: Follow the Standard Structure for a Research Article
Most social science journals expect submissions to follow a recognizable structure. Use this as your framework from the start:
- Introduction and background. Contextualize your topic, establish the problem you're addressing, and identify your research questions clearly.
- Literature review. Identify the theoretical or conceptual framework that informs your study. Focus on sources from the past decade where possible, and organize your discussion around your research questions. A strong literature review doesn't just summarize existing work; it offers critique and positions your study within the broader conversation in your field.
- Methodology. Explain clearly what you did, with whom, and how. A well written methodology section allows another researcher to replicate your study and reach the same conclusions.
- Results and findings. Present your findings organized by research question or hypothesis for quantitative studies, or by themes and generalizations for qualitative work.
- Discussion and conclusion. Explain how your findings align with or challenge previous research. Offer insights and recommendations for future research and practice.
Step 3: Be Consistent With Tense, Voice, and Formatting
Inconsistency in academic writing is distracting and signals to peer reviewers that a manuscript isn't ready. Before you submit, make sure you've addressed the following:
- Verb tense. Decide whether you'll discuss the literature in present tense (Smith and Jones suggest) or past tense (Miller and Thompson argued) and apply it consistently throughout.
- Point of view. Choose either first person (we analyzed the data) or third person (the researchers surveyed) and stick with it. In academic writing, avoid second person unless it appears inside a direct quote.
- Heading formatting. Use proper formatting for each heading level, typically following APA style, to help readers follow the structure of your paper.
If you're unsure about any of these conventions, a professional editor who specializes in academic work can review your manuscript and make sure it's consistent and ready for peer review. Our research paper editing services are built for exactly this stage of the process.
Step 4: Choose the Right Journal for Your Research
Selecting the right journal is one of the most important decisions in the publication process. A good starting point is your own reference list. If you've cited a particular journal multiple times, there's a strong chance your topic aligns with its scope. Visit the journal's website and look for an "Aims and Scope" or "About the Journal" page to confirm the fit before you invest time in formatting your submission.
Don't hesitate to contact the managing editor directly. Send them your abstract and a brief note expressing your interest. Most journal editors are helpful and will let you know if your paper is a strong fit. If it isn't, many will suggest an alternative journal worth considering.
Watch out for predatory journals
As you build your shortlist, screen out predatory journals: outlets that charge publication fees while providing little or no genuine peer review. Warning signs include aggressive email solicitations, promises of unusually fast review, fees that aren't disclosed until after acceptance, and editorial boards you can't verify. Check whether the journal is indexed in established databases for your field, whether it's a member of a recognized publishing body, and whether its claimed impact metrics can be confirmed independently. Publishing in a predatory journal can damage your record rather than strengthen it, so this check is worth the time.
Step 5: Polish Your Manuscript Before You Submit
Peer reviewers evaluate both the quality of your research and the quality of your writing. An unpolished or poorly proofread manuscript is more likely to receive critical feedback, even when the underlying research is strong. Before you submit, make sure your paper is free of grammatical and spelling errors and fully compliant with the journal's submission guidelines, usually found under "Submission Guidelines" or "For Authors" on the journal's website.
Working with a professional academic editor before submission is one of the most effective things you can do to improve your chances of acceptance. An experienced editor can catch issues you've stopped seeing after multiple drafts, ensure your writing meets the standards reviewers expect, and help you present your research in the clearest, most compelling way possible. For submissions where English is your second language, this step is especially valuable, because reviewers often flag non-native phrasing even when the science is sound.
Finally, prepare yourself for the peer review process. Even excellent research is sometimes rejected, particularly at highly selective journals. Peer review is blind, and feedback can feel subjective or harsh. The most important thing you can do is not take it personally, address the feedback constructively, and keep submitting. Every successful academic has experienced rejection at some point in their career.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long does it take to publish a journal article?
The timeline varies significantly depending on the journal. The peer review process alone can take anywhere from a few weeks to several months. After receiving reviewer feedback, you may be asked to revise and resubmit, which adds further time. Budgeting six months to a year from initial submission to publication is realistic for many social science journals.
Do I need a professional editor before submitting a journal article?
Working with a professional academic editor before submission is strongly recommended. Peer reviewers hold manuscripts to a high standard, and avoidable errors in grammar, consistency, or formatting can undermine the reception of otherwise strong research. A professional editor helps you present your work at its best, which is especially valuable when English is your second language and reviewers may flag non-native phrasing.
Can I submit my article to more than one journal at a time?
No, simultaneous submission isn't permitted by most academic journals. You must wait for a decision from one journal before submitting to another. Always check the submission guidelines of your target journal for their specific policy, since violating it can lead to rejection at both journals.
What is the best referencing style for social science journal articles?
APA (American Psychological Association) style is the most widely used format in the social sciences, but requirements vary by journal and discipline. Always check the journal's author guidelines before formatting your references, headings, and in-text citations, because submitting in the wrong style is a common and avoidable reason for early reviewer criticism.
How can I tell if a journal is predatory?
Predatory journals charge publication fees while providing little or no genuine peer review. Warning signs include aggressive email solicitations, promises of unusually fast review, fees not disclosed until after acceptance, and editorial boards you can't verify. Check whether the journal is indexed in established databases for your field, whether it belongs to a recognized publishing body, and whether its claimed impact metrics can be confirmed independently before you submit.
Get Expert Help From Editor World
Editor World offers professional academic editing services and journal article editing at affordable prices. Our expert academic editors include published researchers and university faculty who understand exactly what peer reviewers look for. You choose your own editor, review their credentials and verified client ratings, and communicate with them directly throughout the process. Every editor is a native English speaker from the US, UK, or Canada, and no AI is used at any stage. A certificate of editing is available as an optional add-on for journals that require confirmation of professional editing. Select your editor and submit your document today.
Content reviewed by the Editor World editorial team. Editor World, founded in 2010 by Patti Fisher, PhD, graduate of The Ohio State University, provides professional human-only academic editing, journal article editing, research paper editing, and proofreading for researchers, graduate students, and faculty worldwide. BBB A+ accredited since 2010 with 5.0/5 Google and Facebook Reviews. More than 100 million words edited for over 8,000 clients in 65+ countries. Multiple Gold and Bronze Stevie Award winner. Native English editors from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada. Recommended by the Boston University Economics Department. No AI tools are used at any stage.